Find solutions to your problems with the help of IDNLearn.com's knowledgeable users. Our experts provide accurate and detailed responses to help you navigate any topic or issue with confidence.
Sagot :
Let's solve the problem step-by-step:
First, we need to determine the decimal equivalents of [tex]\(-\frac{4}{5}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{3}{7}\)[/tex] so that we can compare.
1. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{4}{5}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{4}{5} = -0.8 \][/tex]
2. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{3}{7}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{3}{7} \approx -0.4286 \][/tex]
We are looking for rational numbers (fractions) that lie between [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.4286\)[/tex]. Let's examine each option:
### Option (a): [tex]\(-\frac{29}{15}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{20}{15}\)[/tex]
1. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{29}{15}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{29}{15} \approx -1.9333 \][/tex]
2. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{20}{15}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{20}{15} \approx -1.3333 \][/tex]
Both [tex]\(-1.9333\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-1.3333\)[/tex] are less than [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex]. Thus, neither of these two numbers lie between [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.4286\)[/tex].
### Option (b): [tex]\(-\frac{21}{35}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{20}{35}\)[/tex]
1. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{21}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{21}{35} = -0.6 \][/tex]
2. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{20}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{20}{35} \approx -0.5714 \][/tex]
Both [tex]\(-0.6\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.5714\)[/tex] are between [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.4286\)[/tex]. Hence, these numbers satisfy the condition.
### Option (c): [tex]\(-\frac{28}{35}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{25}{35}\)[/tex]
1. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{28}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{28}{35} \approx -0.8 \][/tex]
2. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{25}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{25}{35} \approx -0.7143 \][/tex]
Neither of these numbers are within the range [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.4286\)[/tex]. While [tex]\(-0.7143\)[/tex] could be considered in range, [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex] is the lower boundary and does not strictly satisfy lying between the values.
### Option (d): [tex]\(-\frac{14}{35}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{13}{35}\)[/tex]
1. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{14}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{14}{35} \approx -0.4 \][/tex]
2. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{13}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{13}{35} \approx -0.3714 \][/tex]
Both [tex]\(-0.4\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.3714\)[/tex] are greater than [tex]\(-0.4286\)[/tex]. Thus, neither of these numbers satisfy the condition.
### Conclusion:
The rational numbers in option (b) are the ones that lie between [tex]\(-\frac{4}{5}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{3}{7}\)[/tex]:
[tex]\(\boxed{b}\)[/tex]
First, we need to determine the decimal equivalents of [tex]\(-\frac{4}{5}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{3}{7}\)[/tex] so that we can compare.
1. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{4}{5}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{4}{5} = -0.8 \][/tex]
2. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{3}{7}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{3}{7} \approx -0.4286 \][/tex]
We are looking for rational numbers (fractions) that lie between [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.4286\)[/tex]. Let's examine each option:
### Option (a): [tex]\(-\frac{29}{15}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{20}{15}\)[/tex]
1. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{29}{15}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{29}{15} \approx -1.9333 \][/tex]
2. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{20}{15}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{20}{15} \approx -1.3333 \][/tex]
Both [tex]\(-1.9333\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-1.3333\)[/tex] are less than [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex]. Thus, neither of these two numbers lie between [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.4286\)[/tex].
### Option (b): [tex]\(-\frac{21}{35}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{20}{35}\)[/tex]
1. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{21}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{21}{35} = -0.6 \][/tex]
2. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{20}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{20}{35} \approx -0.5714 \][/tex]
Both [tex]\(-0.6\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.5714\)[/tex] are between [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.4286\)[/tex]. Hence, these numbers satisfy the condition.
### Option (c): [tex]\(-\frac{28}{35}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{25}{35}\)[/tex]
1. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{28}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{28}{35} \approx -0.8 \][/tex]
2. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{25}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{25}{35} \approx -0.7143 \][/tex]
Neither of these numbers are within the range [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.4286\)[/tex]. While [tex]\(-0.7143\)[/tex] could be considered in range, [tex]\(-0.8\)[/tex] is the lower boundary and does not strictly satisfy lying between the values.
### Option (d): [tex]\(-\frac{14}{35}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{13}{35}\)[/tex]
1. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{14}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{14}{35} \approx -0.4 \][/tex]
2. Convert [tex]\(-\frac{13}{35}\)[/tex] to decimal:
[tex]\[ -\frac{13}{35} \approx -0.3714 \][/tex]
Both [tex]\(-0.4\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-0.3714\)[/tex] are greater than [tex]\(-0.4286\)[/tex]. Thus, neither of these numbers satisfy the condition.
### Conclusion:
The rational numbers in option (b) are the ones that lie between [tex]\(-\frac{4}{5}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(-\frac{3}{7}\)[/tex]:
[tex]\(\boxed{b}\)[/tex]
We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com is dedicated to providing accurate answers. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more solutions.
