Answered

IDNLearn.com is your go-to platform for finding reliable answers quickly. Our experts provide timely and accurate responses to help you navigate any topic or issue with confidence.

If a public official wanted to prove libel against the press, he or she would have to show:

A. That the information accused them of wrongdoing.
B. That the information was false, damaging, and "made with actual malice."
C. That the information was damaging to their reputation.
D. That the information was obscene.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

To prove libel against the press, a public official must show that the information was false, damaging, and made with actual malice.


Explanation:

Libel is a form of defamation where false and damaging information is published. In order to prove libel against the press, a public official must demonstrate that the information was false, damaging, and 'made with actual malice'. This means showing that the publication was done with a reckless disregard for the truth.


Learn more about Libel here:

https://brainly.com/question/32534703


Your engagement is important to us. Keep sharing your knowledge and experiences. Let's create a learning environment that is both enjoyable and beneficial. Find clear and concise answers at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more dependable solutions.