Answered

Discover a wealth of knowledge and get your questions answered at IDNLearn.com. Find the answers you need quickly and accurately with help from our knowledgeable and experienced experts.

If a public official wanted to prove libel against the press, he or she would have to show:

A. That the information accused them of wrongdoing.
B. That the information was false, damaging, and "made with actual malice."
C. That the information was damaging to their reputation.
D. That the information was obscene.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

To prove libel against the press, a public official must show that the information was false, damaging, and made with actual malice.


Explanation:

Libel is a form of defamation where false and damaging information is published. In order to prove libel against the press, a public official must demonstrate that the information was false, damaging, and 'made with actual malice'. This means showing that the publication was done with a reckless disregard for the truth.


Learn more about Libel here:

https://brainly.com/question/32534703


We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com for your queries. We’re here to provide accurate answers, so visit us again soon.