IDNLearn.com provides a user-friendly platform for finding and sharing accurate answers. Ask any question and receive timely, accurate responses from our dedicated community of experts.
Sagot :
Let’s analyze the end behavior of the function [tex]\( g(x) = \frac{x^2 + 6x}{30} \)[/tex].
Step-by-Step Analysis:
1. Understanding the Function: We have [tex]\( g(x) = \frac{x^2 + 6x}{30} \)[/tex].
2. Leading Term Dominance: For large values of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] (either very large positive or very large negative), the [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex] term in the numerator will dominate over the [tex]\( 6x \)[/tex] term since [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex] grows much faster than [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
3. End Behavior as [tex]\( x \to \infty \)[/tex]:
- As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] becomes very large, [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex] will dominate, and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] will behave approximately like [tex]\( \frac{x^2}{30} \)[/tex].
- Thus, as [tex]\( x \to \infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( \frac{x^2}{30} \)[/tex] increases without bound.
- Therefore, [tex]\( g(x) \to \infty \)[/tex] as [tex]\( x \to \infty \)[/tex].
4. End Behavior as [tex]\( x \to -\infty \)[/tex]:
- Similarly, for very large negative values of [tex]\( x \)[/tex], [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex] still dominates because [tex]\( (-x)^2 = x^2 \)[/tex].
- So, [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] will again behave like [tex]\( \frac{x^2}{30} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, as [tex]\( x \to -\infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( \frac{x^2}{30} \)[/tex] increases without bound.
- Thus, [tex]\( g(x) \to \infty \)[/tex] as [tex]\( x \to -\infty \)[/tex].
From this analysis, we can conclude that as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches either [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex] or [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex].
Selecting Correct Statement:
Given these conclusions, the correct statement is:
- As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex]; and as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex].
However, this exact match is not provided in the options. The closest option, aligning to our conclusion, is the interpretation of the positive bound behavior:
The closest correct option seems to be:
- As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex] or [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex].
Which aligns with one intermediate result as:
So, reflecting on the best available correct behavior:
Correct Answer: As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( -\infty, g(x) \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex]; and as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty, g(x) approaches \infty \)[/tex].
Step-by-Step Analysis:
1. Understanding the Function: We have [tex]\( g(x) = \frac{x^2 + 6x}{30} \)[/tex].
2. Leading Term Dominance: For large values of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] (either very large positive or very large negative), the [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex] term in the numerator will dominate over the [tex]\( 6x \)[/tex] term since [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex] grows much faster than [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
3. End Behavior as [tex]\( x \to \infty \)[/tex]:
- As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] becomes very large, [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex] will dominate, and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] will behave approximately like [tex]\( \frac{x^2}{30} \)[/tex].
- Thus, as [tex]\( x \to \infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( \frac{x^2}{30} \)[/tex] increases without bound.
- Therefore, [tex]\( g(x) \to \infty \)[/tex] as [tex]\( x \to \infty \)[/tex].
4. End Behavior as [tex]\( x \to -\infty \)[/tex]:
- Similarly, for very large negative values of [tex]\( x \)[/tex], [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex] still dominates because [tex]\( (-x)^2 = x^2 \)[/tex].
- So, [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] will again behave like [tex]\( \frac{x^2}{30} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, as [tex]\( x \to -\infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( \frac{x^2}{30} \)[/tex] increases without bound.
- Thus, [tex]\( g(x) \to \infty \)[/tex] as [tex]\( x \to -\infty \)[/tex].
From this analysis, we can conclude that as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches either [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex] or [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex].
Selecting Correct Statement:
Given these conclusions, the correct statement is:
- As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex]; and as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex].
However, this exact match is not provided in the options. The closest option, aligning to our conclusion, is the interpretation of the positive bound behavior:
The closest correct option seems to be:
- As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex] or [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex].
Which aligns with one intermediate result as:
So, reflecting on the best available correct behavior:
Correct Answer: As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( -\infty, g(x) \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex]; and as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty, g(x) approaches \infty \)[/tex].
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. For dependable and accurate answers, visit IDNLearn.com. Thanks for visiting, and see you next time for more helpful information.
