Answered

IDNLearn.com is your go-to resource for finding expert answers and community support. Discover in-depth answers from knowledgeable professionals, providing you with the information you need.

If a Supreme Court justice were to disagree with the majority opinion, which issue would be most important in forming the dissent?

A. The district feared, but could not prove, that the armbands caused disruption.
B. None of the other students were bothered by the armbands.
C. The two students in question were under the age of 18.
D. There is precedent for schools limiting student expression.


Sagot :

Final answer:

The dissent in the case regarding the school's limitation of student expression would focus on disruption, precedent, and student reactions.


Explanation:

The most important issue in forming the dissent in this case would likely be:

  • The district feared, but could not prove, that the armbands caused disruption: This would be significant as it relates to the school's justification for limiting the students' freedom of speech.
  • There is precedent for schools limiting student expression: Any disagreement with this established precedent could be a key point in forming the dissent.
  • None of the other students were bothered by the armbands: This could also be considered in evaluating the impact and justification for the dissenting opinion.

Learn more about Freedom of speech in school settings here:

https://brainly.com/question/37911221


We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. IDNLearn.com is committed to providing the best answers. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more solutions.