To determine which statements best demonstrate bias, let's evaluate each statement based on the given statistics.
1. Dante Ferris is the best wide receiver in the league.
- This statement is subjective as it states an opinion ("the best") without backing it up with specific metrics. Therefore, it demonstrates bias since it lacks objective support.
2. Anthony Hall has more receptions than CJ Ramirez.
- Looking at the numbers, Anthony Hall has 97 receptions, while CJ Ramirez has 89 receptions. This statement is factually correct and unbiased.
3. Anthony Hall has the fewest number of touchdowns.
- Comparing the touchdowns: Anthony Hall has 10, while Dante Ferris has 13 and CJ Ramirez has 12. This is a factual statement and is unbiased.
4. CJ Ramirez is the worst of these three players.
- This statement is subjective, as "the worst" implies an opinion without providing clear criteria. This makes it biased.
5. Dante Ferris has the most receptions and touchdowns.
- For receptions, Dante Ferris has 104, which is indeed the highest. However, for touchdowns, Dante has 13, whereas CJ Ramirez has 12, which is incorrect as Dante does not have the most touchdowns. This statement is factually incorrect and hence can be considered biased.
6. CJ Ramirez ran for more yards than either Ferris or Hall.
- Looking at the yards: CJ Ramirez has 1519 yards, Dante Ferris has 1404 yards, and Anthony Hall has 1305 yards. This statement is factually correct and unbiased.
Given the analysis, the two statements that best demonstrate bias are:
1. Dante Ferris is the best wide receiver in the league.
4. CJ Ramirez is the worst of these three players.
Both statements are subjective, lacking objective support, and exhibit personal opinion rather than factual analysis.
