Discover new information and get your questions answered with IDNLearn.com. Join our community to receive prompt and reliable responses to your questions from experienced professionals.
Sagot :
To determine which statement correctly describes the preimage [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] when [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex] is dilated by a scale factor of [tex]\(\frac{1}{2}\)[/tex] from the origin, follow these steps:
1. Identify the coordinates of [tex]\(E^{\prime}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F^{\prime}\)[/tex]:
- [tex]\(E^{\prime} = (1, 0)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(F^{\prime} = (1, 3)\)[/tex]
2. Apply the dilation with scale factor [tex]\(\frac{1}{2}\)[/tex] to these coordinates:
To calculate the coordinates of the preimage points [tex]\(E\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F\)[/tex], multiply the coordinates of [tex]\(E^{\prime}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F^{\prime}\)[/tex] by the scale factor [tex]\(\frac{1}{2}\)[/tex]:
- For point [tex]\(E^{\prime}(1, 0)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ E = \left(\frac{1}{2} \times 1, \frac{1}{2} \times 0\right) = \left(0.5, 0\right) \][/tex]
- For point [tex]\(F^{\prime}(1, 3)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ F = \left(\frac{1}{2} \times 1, \frac{1}{2} \times 3\right) = \left(0.5, 1.5\right) \][/tex]
3. Verify the statements given:
- Statement 1: [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] is located at [tex]\(E(0.5, 0)\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F(0.5, 1.5)\)[/tex] and is half the size of [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex].
- This statement is correct because the coordinates match the calculated preimage coordinates, and the dilation factor ensures that [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] is indeed half the size of [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex].
- Statement 2: [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] is located at [tex]\(E(1, 0)\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F(1, 3)\)[/tex] and is the same size as [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex].
- This statement is incorrect because the coordinates of [tex]\(E\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F\)[/tex] are not transformed.
- Statement 3: [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] is located at [tex]\(E(2, 0)\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F(2, 6)\)[/tex] and is twice the size of [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex].
- This statement is incorrect. A scale factor of [tex]\(\frac{1}{2}\)[/tex] would not produce coordinates that double.
- Statement 4: [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] is located at [tex]\(E(3, 0)\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F(3, 9)\)[/tex] and is three times the size of [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex].
- This statement is incorrect because the coordinates do not reflect the correct transformation and the size factor is wrong.
4. Conclusion:
The correct statement is:
[tex]\[ \overline{E F} \text{ is located at } E(0.5,0) \text{ and } F(0.5,1.5) \text{ and is half the size of } \overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}. \][/tex]
Therefore, the answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{1} \][/tex]
1. Identify the coordinates of [tex]\(E^{\prime}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F^{\prime}\)[/tex]:
- [tex]\(E^{\prime} = (1, 0)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(F^{\prime} = (1, 3)\)[/tex]
2. Apply the dilation with scale factor [tex]\(\frac{1}{2}\)[/tex] to these coordinates:
To calculate the coordinates of the preimage points [tex]\(E\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F\)[/tex], multiply the coordinates of [tex]\(E^{\prime}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F^{\prime}\)[/tex] by the scale factor [tex]\(\frac{1}{2}\)[/tex]:
- For point [tex]\(E^{\prime}(1, 0)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ E = \left(\frac{1}{2} \times 1, \frac{1}{2} \times 0\right) = \left(0.5, 0\right) \][/tex]
- For point [tex]\(F^{\prime}(1, 3)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ F = \left(\frac{1}{2} \times 1, \frac{1}{2} \times 3\right) = \left(0.5, 1.5\right) \][/tex]
3. Verify the statements given:
- Statement 1: [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] is located at [tex]\(E(0.5, 0)\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F(0.5, 1.5)\)[/tex] and is half the size of [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex].
- This statement is correct because the coordinates match the calculated preimage coordinates, and the dilation factor ensures that [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] is indeed half the size of [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex].
- Statement 2: [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] is located at [tex]\(E(1, 0)\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F(1, 3)\)[/tex] and is the same size as [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex].
- This statement is incorrect because the coordinates of [tex]\(E\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F\)[/tex] are not transformed.
- Statement 3: [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] is located at [tex]\(E(2, 0)\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F(2, 6)\)[/tex] and is twice the size of [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex].
- This statement is incorrect. A scale factor of [tex]\(\frac{1}{2}\)[/tex] would not produce coordinates that double.
- Statement 4: [tex]\(\overline{E F}\)[/tex] is located at [tex]\(E(3, 0)\)[/tex] and [tex]\(F(3, 9)\)[/tex] and is three times the size of [tex]\(\overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}\)[/tex].
- This statement is incorrect because the coordinates do not reflect the correct transformation and the size factor is wrong.
4. Conclusion:
The correct statement is:
[tex]\[ \overline{E F} \text{ is located at } E(0.5,0) \text{ and } F(0.5,1.5) \text{ and is half the size of } \overline{E^{\prime} F^{\prime}}. \][/tex]
Therefore, the answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{1} \][/tex]
Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com is committed to your satisfaction. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more helpful answers.
