Explore a world of knowledge and get your questions answered on IDNLearn.com. Whether it's a simple query or a complex problem, our experts have the answers you need.

On a number line, a number, [tex]b[/tex], is located the same distance from 0 as another number, [tex]a[/tex], but in the opposite direction. The number [tex]b[/tex] varies directly with the number [tex]a[/tex]. For example, [tex]b=2 \frac{3}{4}[/tex] when [tex]a=-2 \frac{3}{4}[/tex]. Which equation represents this direct variation between [tex]a[/tex] and [tex]b[/tex]?

A. [tex]b=-a[/tex]
B. [tex]-b=-a[/tex]
C. [tex]b-a=0[/tex]
D. [tex]b(-a)=0[/tex]


Sagot :

We need to determine the correct equation that represents the relationship between the numbers [tex]\(a\)[/tex] and [tex]\(b\)[/tex]. Let's analyze each of the provided options step by step:

1. Option 1: [tex]\(b = -a\)[/tex]

If a number [tex]\(b\)[/tex] is located the same distance from 0 as another number [tex]\(a\)[/tex], but in the opposite direction, then [tex]\(b\)[/tex] should indeed be the negative of [tex]\(a\)[/tex]. For example, if [tex]\(a = 3\)[/tex], then [tex]\(b\)[/tex] should be [tex]\(-3\)[/tex], and if [tex]\(a = -2\)[/tex], then [tex]\(b\)[/tex] should be [tex]\(2\)[/tex]. This is described perfectly by the equation [tex]\(b = -a\)[/tex]. Furthermore, this matches the example given where [tex]\( b = 2\frac{3}{4}\)[/tex] when [tex]\( a = -2\frac{3}{4}\)[/tex].

2. Option 2: [tex]\(-b = -a\)[/tex]

Simplifying this, we get [tex]\(b = a\)[/tex]. This would imply that [tex]\(b\)[/tex] is exactly the same as [tex]\(a\)[/tex], which contradicts the given scenario that [tex]\(b\)[/tex] is in the opposite direction to [tex]\(a\)[/tex].

3. Option 3: [tex]\(b - a = 0\)[/tex]

Simplifying this equation, we get [tex]\(b = a\)[/tex]. Again, this implies that [tex]\(b\)[/tex] is the same as [tex]\(a\)[/tex], which is not correct because [tex]\(b\)[/tex] is supposed to be in the opposite direction to [tex]\(a\)[/tex].

4. Option 4: [tex]\(b(-a) = 0\)[/tex]

For [tex]\(b(-a) = 0\)[/tex] to hold true for all values of [tex]\(a\)[/tex], [tex]\(b\)[/tex] would always have to be [tex]\(0\)[/tex]. This does not represent a useful or general relationship between [tex]\(a\)[/tex] and [tex]\(b\)[/tex], as it doesn't apply to cases where [tex]\(a\)[/tex] or [tex]\(b\)[/tex] are non-zero.

Therefore, the correct equation that represents the direct variation and the given conditions is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{b = -a} \][/tex]
Thank you for being part of this discussion. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. IDNLearn.com provides the best answers to your questions. Thank you for visiting, and come back soon for more helpful information.